Viewing: Notes » Echoes #3.
Echoes #3.
(2 minute read.)
The case for... (continued).
Here's more of the exploration of 'informal presentation, etcetera' which began in 'Echoes…' and contined into 'Echoes #2'.
Here's the Claude view… mercifully brief (even I'm beginning to tire)
Yes, there's a real case for it—this site is actually a decent example of why it can work.
When informal self-presentation works well:- Filtering, not just tone. The site explicitly says its content and meandering, conversationally-toned style is entirely intentional, and it's upfront that the person is no longer available for business advice or to collaborate on others' ventures unless there's a really good reason. Informality here does real work: it pre-qualifies who bothers to reach out.
- Credibility through candor. The person describes himself as usually extremely direct and bluntly outspoken, unconventional, and not the polished briefcase type. For someone selling '40 years of blunt strategic advice,' sounding blunt on the homepage is consistent—the medium matches the message.
- Standing out. In a sea of LinkedIn-speak ('I help start, run, grow, and fix businesses'–which he even mocks), a weird, personal, slightly chaotic site is memorable precisely because it isn't optimized.
- Signals confidence/scarcity. Someone who doesn't need to impress you can afford to be casual. That itself is a status signal in consulting-type fields.
- If you need to convert cold visitors into leads or sales, informality that reads as inside-joke or self-indulgent can confuse or repel people who don't already trust you.
- It works best for personal brands/solo practitioners with an established reputation—less so for teams, regulated industries, or anyone whose buyer needs quick reassurance of competence.
- It requires genuine writing skill to land as 'authentic' rather than 'unfinished.' Badly done, it just looks unprofessional rather than intentional.
So the case isn't 'informal is better'—it's that informality can be a deliberate filter and differentiator when your business depends on personal trust and self-selection rather than mass conversion.
That the site uses a four letter domain (glvr), a derivative of the owner's name (gulliver) is a nice detail. A short, cryptic domain reinforces the same signal as the writing style: it rewards people who already know who he is (or are willing to click through and find out), rather than trying to explain itself upfront to a cold visitor. It's consistent branding, really—the domain, the tone, and the 'you'll get it or you won't' attitude are all the same move in different forms.
**********
So that was Claude.
Next-up, and to close, is OpenAI…
Never miss a Note… get updates by email or rss.